Check for uses of non-inclusive language in the Peer Review documentation and checklist.

In particular we have the following:

[] Sanity check

Here's a list of alternatives https://gist.github.com/seanmhanson/fe370c2d8bd2b3228680e38899baf5cc (Courtesy of emerrill):

• Quick check
• Initial check
• Confidence check
• Coherence check
• Soundness check
• Calibration check
• Rationality check

I would suggest that the most appropriate alternatives in our case are either "Rationality check" or "Coherence check" but I'll leave this for comments for 48 hours before making changes.